My Photo

Search


Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Interesting Links

    Other Content

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 08/2003

    Become a Fan

    « Nearly caught my tail | Main | Top Bentley post »

    Thursday, May 15, 2008

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345296c369e200e55227174a8833

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Charles we don't have time for this:

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    Peter Kirk

    Good post. But you miss the irony that felling and replanting sustainable forests, for timber and paper, is actually taking huge quantities of CO2 out of the atmosphere, and not putting it back unless the wood or paper is burned.

    no climatologist seems to thing that is anything like enough

    It is also ironic that both you and John Hobbins are making exaggerated claims about all climatologists, but saying more or less the opposite about them. As I took John to task, to be fair I will also take you to task. Since there are some climatologists (John claims all of them!) who don't think anthropogenic CO2 is a problem, it can hardly be true that all of them think that an 18% cut in emissions is inadequate. Both John's claim and yours would be much more convincing if you avoided hyperbole which is transparently untrue.

    Dave

    Peter,

    Sustainable forests are good, but are not replacements for rainforests.

    In my defence I have never exaggerated about anything at all.

    The last International Conference thingy made it clear that that the chances of global warming not being connected to human activity are very small indeed. So while I accept that saying ALL is a slight exaggeration I do not think it is a very big one.

    The comments to this entry are closed.